“The character traits you discover in yourself through developing others can be as significant as the core traits that have always been present.”
The Stories Behind the Stories: Jon
Jon had four character traits.
Analytical thinking.
Empathy.
Creativity.
Relationship-building.
He had been deploying them one at a time for three years.
And by every Friday afternoon — an exhaustion that had nothing to do with how much work he had done.
In this chapter of The Stories Behind the Stories, I go deeper into integrated character traits as a system — what they created when Jon’s four traits finally worked together rather than taking turns. For his analytical thinking, empathy, creativity and relationship-building. For the five capabilities he discovered in himself only through the act of developing others.
The Stories Behind The Stories Jon
Welcome to The Stories Behind the Stories.
Where I go deeper into the WorkLife Stories I’ve crafted.
The thinking behind the ideas.
The experiences that shaped that thinking.
The lessons learned from those experiences.
Today’s episode is Jon.
His story is told in: How Integrated Leadership Character Traits Build Organisational Capacity
Today I want to go deeper into the character traits at the heart of Jon’s story.
The four traits that worked best not separately but as a system.
And the five traits he discovered in himself only through the act of developing them in others.
Combined, all these traits are what this episode is really about.
The Story Behind the Stories: What Developing Others Revealed.
“The character traits you discover in yourself through developing others can be as significant as the core traits that have always been present.”
Jon already knew what his four character traits were.
Analytical thinking.
Empathy.
Creativity.
Relationship-building.
The Monday morning crisis showed him what they could do when they worked as a system rather than taking turns.
Four Traits. One System.
That crisis revealed something Jon hadn’t fully understood before.
Each of his four traits was powerful in its own right.
Analytical thinking that saw patterns others moved past.
Empathy that read what people needed beneath what they said.
Creativity that generated possibilities analytical thinking alone would never surface.
Relationship-building that created the trust within which everything else became possible.
Each one distinctive.
Each one creating something the others couldn’t create alone.
But together — they created something none of them could have produced separately.
His analytical thinking became more insightful when informed by empathy.
His empathy became more actionable when grounded in analytical understanding.
His creativity became more practical when shaped by what his analytical thinking knew was possible.
His relationship-building became more authentic when supported by genuine insight and creative problem-solving.
Not four traits taking turns.
One integrated capability.
That was what the crisis made visible.
That was what the exhaustion of three years of sequential deployment had been costing.
And once he understood that — a deeper discovery arrived.
The discovery that deepened everything happened over nine months of watching three people on his team and asking himself a question he had never thought to ask before.
Not — how is this person performing?
But — what character traits are expressing themselves here?
Watching Differently
He watched Rhona spend thirty minutes tracing system dependencies whilst others proposed solutions quickly.
He had always read that as slowness.
Now — watching differently — he saw something else entirely.
Systematic thoroughness combined with analytical precision.
Finding patterns that speed had moved past without noticing.
Revealing root causes that faster approaches would have missed.
Not slowness.
A character trait doing exactly what it was designed to do.
And in seeing it — Jon discovered something about himself he hadn’t known was there.
The ability to see potential through character traits.
Not through performance.
Not through results.
Through the way someone naturally engaged with their work.
He hadn’t known he could see that way.
Watching Rhona made it visible.
He watched Sam on a routine client call.
Genuine interest in what the client was trying to accomplish.
An inability to leave anything unclear or unresolved.
Two character traits building sustained trust in a way no amount of relationship training could manufacture.
And then he had to develop this in Sam.
Not teach him what Jon himself knew.
Teach him in the way Sam naturally learned.
Sam learned through stories and relationships — not through frameworks or analytical structures.
So Jon taught through narratives.
Specific client stories that showed business development not as methodology but as relationship evolving into partnership.
He hadn’t known he could adapt his teaching that way.
The work of developing Sam made it visible.
Then there was Julian.
Who paused a team meeting midway through updates and asked: What are we not talking about?
And watched the room shift in a way Jon had never managed through efficiency and structure.
When Jon coached Julian — he had to find a different approach again.
Julian needed structured experimentation with specific feedback.
Not explanation.
Not framework.
Practice — followed by precision.
So Jon created progressively challenging scenarios.
Watched.
Gave feedback that was exact about what worked and what needed adjusting.
Then watched Julian try again.
And in the hours of sitting with Julian — tracing exactly what his empathetic facilitation was doing and where it could go further — Jon noticed something unexpected.
He wasn’t waiting for Julian to get it.
He was absorbed.
His analytical thinking was diagnosing the precise gap.
His empathy understood Julian’s discomfort in the difficult moments.
His creativity was generating approaches Julian could try.
His relationship-building was creating the safety for him to experiment.
All four traits operating together.
Creating something that felt effortless because it was exactly the right work for who Jon was.
He had never thought of himself as particularly patient.
But this wasn’t patience as tolerance.
This was patience as full engagement.
And he hadn’t known the difference until the work of developing Julian made it visible.
What Developing Others Revealed
Nine months in — Jon understood something that none of his previous work had required him to understand.
He hadn’t been developing three individuals.
He had been building an organisational system.
Rhona’s insights informing Sam’s client conversations.
Sam’s client intelligence informing Julian’s team development priorities.
Julian’s observations about team capability informing Rhona’s technical understanding.
Three character trait combinations that didn’t just serve their individual work — that informed and strengthened each other.
Jon had been thinking about succession.
He discovered he was thinking about organisational architecture.
The ability to see how character traits could be matched to work, how those matches could create a system, how that system could outlast any individual within it —that wasn’t succession planning.
That was a character trait Jon hadn’t known he possessed.
And it had only emerged because the work demanded it.
When Holding Back Is the Work
And then the hardest discovery of all.
Oversight without control.
When Rhona presented her first fully independent product review — Jon’s instinct was to intervene when she struggled.
He didn’t.
When Sam handled his first fully independent client expansion conversation — Jon’s instinct was to message guidance when the client mentioned something Sam didn’t immediately address.
He didn’t.
When Julian facilitated his first fully independent team development session — Jon’s instinct was to enter when the silence became uncomfortable.
He didn’t.
Each time — he held back.
And each time — the person found their own way through.
Not because Jon was being passive.
Because he had developed a capability he hadn’t known he had.
The ability to provide oversight that strengthened others’ ownership rather than replacing it with his own.
That’s not management.
That’s a character trait.
And it only emerged through nine months of resisting the instinct to step in — and watching what became possible when he didn’t.
That’s what Jon’s story shows about character traits that no other story in this series shows quite so clearly.
Developing others doesn’t just build their capability.
It reveals yours.
The character traits that emerge through the act of developing someone else are often the most significant ones of all.
Because they only appear when you’re fully engaged in work that demands everything you have — not for yourself, but for someone else.
FROM MY NOTEBOOK
On Character Traits
Character traits reveal themselves most fully not in the work we do for ourselves but in the work we do that genuinely matters to others.
This is something Jon’s story shows more clearly than any other in this series.
The traits he discovered in himself — seeing potential, teaching through character, patience as engagement, succession as organisational thinking, oversight without control — none of them appeared in the work he did alone.
All of them appeared in the work he did for Rhona, Sam and Julian.
Character traits need the right demand to reveal themselves.
Sometimes that demand comes from a problem that matters.
Sometimes — as Jon discovered — it comes from a person who does.
On Integrated Leadership
How Integrated Leadership Character Traits Build Organisational Capacity is Jon’s story.
And it’s the story of what analytical thinking, empathy, creativity and relationship-building — as an integrated system of character traits — create when they finally operate together rather than taking turns.
And what that integration reveals when turned outward toward the development of others.
On Analytical Thinking
Analytical thinking is a character trait that sees patterns, maps implications and identifies what matters most in any complex situation.
In Jon’s work it meant understanding not just what the data showed but what it revealed about the decisions that needed to follow.
And it can be developed.
As a practice of rigorous curiosity.
Before any significant situation — ask what the complete picture shows.
What patterns are present that a quick assessment would miss?
What does this reveal about what comes next?
That’s how analytical thinking develops.
Through the consistent practice of looking further than the immediate and the obvious.
On Empathy
Empathy as a leadership character trait shapes how analytical thinking, creativity and relationship-building operate.
It’s not separate from the others.
It informs all of them.
In Jon’s crisis meeting — his empathy wasn’t taking a turn.
It was simultaneously reading what the client actually needed beneath the anger, informing how he framed the analytical findings, shaping which creative solutions he offered, and determining how he held the room together.
And it can be developed.
As a practice of genuine attention to what people actually need — not just what they’re saying.
Before every significant interaction — ask what this person needs that they haven’t found the words for yet.
Let that shape everything else.
On Creativity
Creativity as a character trait generates possibilities that analytical thinking alone would never surface.
In Jon’s work it meant seeing solutions that weren’t obvious — approaches that served multiple needs simultaneously, reframes that changed how problems were understood.
And it can be developed.
As a practice of generative thinking.
When facing any challenge — before settling on the first workable solution, ask what else might be possible.
What approach would serve more than one need at once?
What reframe would change the nature of the problem itself?
That’s how creativity develops as a leadership character trait.
Through the consistent practice of staying in the question a little longer than feels comfortable.
On Relationship-Building
Relationship-building as a character trait creates the trust within which everything else becomes possible.
In Jon’s crisis meeting — it wasn’t a separate capability he activated at the right moment.
It was present throughout.
Holding the room.
Creating enough safety for honest conversation.
Building enough trust for people to commit to a path forward.
And it can be developed.
As a practice of genuine investment in the people around you.
Ask — what does this person need from me beyond the task we’re working on together?
How can I create enough trust here that the real conversation can happen?
On Integration
Integration is what happens when character traits stop taking turns and start working as a system.
In Jon’s work — analytical thinking informed by empathy became more insightful.
Empathy grounded in analytical understanding became more actionable.
Creativity shaped by analytical constraints became more practical.
Relationship-building supported by genuine insight and creative problem-solving became more authentic.
Together they created something none of them could create alone.
And it can be developed.
As a practice of allowing.
The next time a situation demands your full capability — resist the instinct to sequence. Let your traits inform each other in real time.
Notice what that creates that sequential deployment never could.
On Seeing Potential
Seeing potential through character traits is a capability that only emerges when you stop evaluating performance and start watching how someone naturally engages with their work.
Jon discovered this watching Rhona.
Not — is she working fast enough? But — what is this way of working revealing about how she thinks?
The shift from performance evaluation to character recognition is a profound one.
And it can be developed.
As a practice of a different kind of attention.
When observing the people you work with — ask not what they’re producing but how they’re naturally approaching the work.
What does their instinct reveal?
What does the way they hesitate reveal?
What does the thing they spend extra time on reveal?
That’s how seeing potential develops.
Through the consistent practice of looking at character rather than output.
On Teaching Through Character
Teaching through character means adapting how you develop someone to match how they naturally learn — not how you naturally teach.
Jon discovered this through Rhona, Sam and Julian.
Rhona needed the complete framework before any part of it.
Sam needed stories and relationships before frameworks.
Julian needed structured practice before explanation.
Three people. Three entirely different approaches. All shaped by what Jon saw in their character traits.
And it can be developed.
As a practice of seeing each person as distinct.
Before developing anyone — ask how they naturally learn.
Not how you would want to learn.
How they would.
Then shape your approach entirely around that.
On Patience as Full Engagement
Patience that comes from full engagement is entirely different from patience as tolerance.
Tolerance waits for something to be over.
Full engagement is absorbed by it.
Jon discovered the difference in the hours he spent with Julian — tracing exactly what his empathetic facilitation was doing and where it could go further.
He wasn’t waiting.
He was completely present.
And it can be developed.
By finding the work that makes patience unnecessary because you’re too absorbed to notice time passing.
Ask — what work absorbs me so completely that I lose track of everything else?
That’s where full engagement lives.
And where patience as a character trait reveals itself.
On Succession as Organisational Thinking
Succession thinking that sees the full organisational picture — how different character traits can form a system, how that system can create capacity that outlasts any individual —is a character trait that only emerges when individual development is no longer enough.
Jon discovered this when he realised he wasn’t developing three people.
He was building something.
An architecture.
Where Rhona’s insights informed Sam’s client conversations.
Where Sam’s client intelligence informed Julian’s team development.
Where Julian’s observations informed Rhona’s technical understanding.
Not three individuals improving.
A system strengthening itself.
And it can be developed.
As a practice of systemic seeing.
Ask — how could the character traits in this team inform and strengthen each other?
What system would emerge if each person’s traits served not just their own work but each other’s?
On Oversight Without Control
Oversight without control can be a difficult character trait to develop.
Because it requires holding back at exactly the moments when stepping in feels most necessary.
Jon discovered it in the final months of Rhona, Sam and Julian’s development.
When Rhona struggled in the executive presentation.
When Sam faced a client challenge he hadn’t encountered before.
When Julian sat in uncomfortable silence in a difficult team session.
Every instinct said intervene.
Every time — he held.
And every time — the person found their own way through.
Not because Jon was being passive.
Because he had learned that the oversight that strengthens ownership is the oversight that trusts before the evidence is complete.
And it can be developed.
By developing trust in what you’ve built.
Ask — have I developed this person enough to trust what they’ll do with the space I give them?
If yes — give them the space. And watch what becomes possible when you’re not in the way of it.
On Jon
I wrote Jon because his story shows what character traits are capable of when development becomes the work.
His four integrated traits — analytical thinking, empathy, creativity, relationship-building — created extraordinary results when they worked as a system.
But it was the five traits he discovered through developing others — seeing potential, teaching through character, patience as full engagement, succession as organisational thinking, oversight without control —that showed what integrated character truly means.
Not traits working together in one person.
Traits developing other traits. In other people.
And revealing new ones in yourself in the process.
That’s the fullest expression of what character traits can do.
On Why These Traits Go Unrecognised
Jon’s four character traits had never gone unrecognised.
They were valued.
They were deployed.
Just not together.
Not as the integrated system they were designed to be.
Sequential deployment was producing acceptable results.
And acceptable results don’t create the pressure to look deeper.
It took a crisis — moving too fast for any of his usual sequencing — to show him what integration actually felt like.
And that’s what had gone unrecognised for Jon – the power of integration – and what that had been costing him.
The five traits he discovered through developing others went unrecognised for a different reason.
Not because the work didn’t demand them.
Because he hadn’t yet done the work that demanded them.
Seeing potential through character traits.
Teaching in ways that honoured different learning approaches.
Patience as full engagement.
Succession as organisational thinking.
Oversight without control.
All of them were there.
Waiting for the work that would make them visible.
That work was developing Rhona, Sam and Julian.
And once it began — they appeared.
One by one.
As the work demanded them.
On Taking Ownership
For Jon, taking ownership meant two things.
First — focusing his integrated traits on the work that genuinely warranted them. The high-stakes situations where all four traits working together created something sequential deployment never could.
Second — developing others whose character traits served the routine work better than his integrated approach had.
Not delegating.
Matching.
Rhona’s systematic thoroughness to the deep analytical work.
Sam’s relationship-building to sustained client management.
Julian’s empathetic facilitation to genuine team development.
Each person excelling at work their character traits specifically served.
Each doing it better than Jon had been doing it whilst treating it as burden between crises.
That’s taking ownership of integrated character traits at their fullest.
Not just deploying them where they create distinctive value.
Building the conditions for everyone else’s traits to do the same.
On This Series
Every character trait in this series is powerful.
Each one in a different way.
Each one creating something the others cannot.
Jon’s story brings this series to its fullest expression — showing that character traits working together as an integrated system create something greater than any single trait could achieve.
And that developing others’ character traits is itself the work that reveals what you’re most deeply capable of.
As you’ll discover through each of the stories in this series — every character trait has its own quiet power.
Its own distinct way of shaping how far someone goes.
And how it is for the people they meet or accompany along the way.
YOUR CHARACTER TRAIT TAKEAWAY
Before you go — something to take with you.
Where are your character traits working separately when they would create something far greater working together?
What character traits in the people you develop are expressing themselves that you haven’t yet seen or developed?
And what could your organisation build if integrated character traits — matched to the work they’re designed to serve — were recognised and developed across every team?
In this episode I’ve completed the eight stories in The Stories Behind the Stories for The Longest Way Round: A Journey of Character.
Eight characters. Eight stories. Eight character traits — and the capabilities they revealed.
Thank you for being part of this series.
Jon’s story originated from the Programme: The Longest Way Round: A Journey of Character — How Embracing Your Natural Traits and the Wisdom of Great Storytellers Can Transform Your Path to Purpose.
His complete story is featured in the Story Lesson How Integrated Leadership Character Traits Build Organisational Capacity. A Story About Strategic Strength, Sustainable Performance, and Developing Others.
Work With Me: Individual WorkLife Coaching, Commissioned Learning Resources, Speaking Engagements and Organisational Partnerships.
Support This Work: Your support makes a difference and helps me to continue creating resources that are accessible to everyone. Thank you. Carmel
Listen to the audio version here:
Share These Learning Resources
These resources are designed as short, effective learning experiences—for individuals managing their own development and companies supporting their people’s growth.
If you think this learning resource story would be helpful to others, share it forward.
Discover more from School of WorkLife
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.